California Court of Appeal
Mundy v. Neal, B219711
In plaintiff's Civ. Code section 55 motion for attorney fees in connection with a suit to force a landowner to install a designated van-accessible handicap parking space, trial court's denial of the motion is affirmed as, for purposes of section 55, a plaintiff who files a dismissal is not the prevailing party under the catalyst theory unless the plaintiff made a prelitigation demand for corrective action, and here, plaintiff did not attempt to settle prior to filing and was not the prevailing party under Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/30/2010
- Published 06/30/2010
Judges
- Ashmann-Gerst, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Morse Mehrban, Glen Timothy