In case involving exercise of eminent domain power over defendant's property, overruling of taking of defendant's property and award of compensation of close to $8 million is reversed where: 1) the trial court erroneously set the date of valuation as the date of trial, rather than the earlier date of deposit, for purposes of the jury trial on compensation; 2) the trial court abused its discretion in permitting expert testimony that relied upon a goodwill valuation methodology that did not value defendant's actual business but instead valued a hypothetical business operating at defendant's facility; 3) the trial court's ruling allowing the jury to assess $77,823.83 of precondemnation damages based on plaintiff's issuance of a Polanco Act notice was erroneous; 4) the jury's compensation award must be vacated and relitigated; and 5) the award of attorney's fees to defendant, which was based, in substantial part, on the now vacated award, must be reversed.