California Court of Appeal
Ridgecrest Charter Sch. v. Sierra Sands Unified Sch. Dist., F045114
A school district's exercise of its discretion in responding to a Proposition 39 facilities request must comport with the evident purpose of the Charter Schools Act to equalize the treatment of charter and district-run schools with respect to the allocation of space between them.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/29/2005
- Published 06/29/2005
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- John Kanberg; Spector, Middleton, Young & Minney, Paul C. Minney, Sacramento, and Cynthia C. Jamison for Plaintiff and Appellant., Foley & Lardner and Gregory V. Moser, San Diego, for California Charter Schools Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Miller Brown & Dannis and Sue Ann Salmon Evans, Long Beach, for Defendant and Respondent., Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, James Scot Yarnell and Lisa R. Allred, Sacramento, for The Education Legal Alliance of the California School Boards Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.