THE PEOPLE v. HILL, A100958
Appellant's contention that the trial court was required to impose a certain sentence is incorrect as the court is not that limited in that it has the discretion to use any of the enhancement's terms of imprisonment in calculating the subordinate term.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/28/2004
- Published 05/28/2004
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Kathleen Woods Novoa, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Big Sur, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Catherine A. Rivlin and Matthew P. Boyle, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.