ILIFF v. DUSTRUD, D039059
Where the relevant renewal statutes unambiguously state that the effective date of any judgment for purposes of enforceability and accrual of the renewal period is the date of entry, plaintiff's renewal application was timely filed within 10 years from the date of entry of the amended judgment.
- Decided 04/17/2003
- Published 04/17/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch and Edward I. Silverman, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Paul S. Dustrud, in pro. per, for Defendant and Appellant., Lawton Law Firm and Dan Lawton, San Diego, for Defendant and Respondent.