BURNS v. NATURE'S BEST, G023339
An instruction that precludes the jury from considering whether a plaintiff had an expectation that a taped telephone conversation would be repeated to others, precludes an essential element of the statutory claim, under 632 of California Privacy Act.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/28/2001
- Published 12/28/2001
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Latham & Watkins, Jon D. Anderson, Costa Mesa, Julie V. King, and Neil G. Kenduck, Santa Ana, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Wood, Bohm & Francis, Lee A. Wood, Bohm, Francis, Kegel & Aguilera and James G. Bohm, Irvine, for Defendants and Appellants.