United States Supreme Court - June 2013 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 3
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 30
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Hollingsworth v. PerryUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Constitutional LawIn challenge to the district court's ruling that California's Proposition 8, which amended the State Constitution to define marriage as a union... |
06/26/2013 | 12-144 |
Sekhar v. USUnited States Supreme Court
White Collar Crime, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant's conviction of attempted extortion, in violation of the Hobbs Act, is reversed, where attempting to compel a person to recommend that his... |
06/26/2013 | 12-357 |
US v. WindsorUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Tax LawIn a tax refund suit, in which plaintiff challenged the determination that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) barred her from claiming the federal... |
06/26/2013 | 12-307 |
Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Family Law, Indian LawIn dispute arising under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) between an adoptive couple and the biological father of the child who had previously... |
06/25/2013 | 12-399 |
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management DistrictUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Property Law & Real EstateIn a dispute involving plaintiff's attempt to obtain permits from defendant to develop a section of his property, defendant's denial of plaintiff's... |
06/25/2013 | 11-1447 |
Shelby County v. HolderUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elections, Government LawSection 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which provides the "coverage formula," defining the "covered jurisdictions" as States or political subdivisions... |
06/25/2013 | 12-96 |
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. BartlettUnited States Supreme Court
Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Drugs & Biotech, Injury & Tort Law, Product LiabilityState-law design-defect claims that turn on the adequacy of a drug's warnings are pre-empted by federal law under PLIVA. Inc. v. Mensing, which held... |
06/24/2013 | 12-142 |
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment LawTitle VII retaliation claims must be proved according to traditional principles of but-for causation, not the lessened causation test stated in 42... |
06/24/2013 | 12-484 |
Ryan v. SchadUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusThe Ninth Circuit's failure to issue its mandate that would allow defendant's execution to proceed as normally required by Federal Rule of Appellate... |
06/24/2013 | 12-1084 |
Vance v. Ball State UniversityUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment LawAn employee is a "supervisor" for purposes of vicarious liability under Title VII only if he or she is empowered by the employer to take tangible... |
06/24/2013 | 11-556 |
Results 1 to 10 of 30