United States Supreme Court - May 2003 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 12
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
BUNKLEY v. FLORIDAUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusIn failing to determine whether the "common pocketknife" exception to Florida's definition of a weapon encompassed petitioner's pocketknife at the... |
05/27/2003 | 02-8636 |
BLACK & DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORDUnited States Supreme Court
ERISA, Labor & Employment LawERISA does not require plan administrators making disability determinations to accord special deference to the opinions of treating physicians, over... |
05/27/2003 | 02-469 |
NAT'L PARK HOSPITALITY ASS'N v. DEP'T OF THE INTERIORUnited States Supreme Court
Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law, Contracts, Government ContractsA National Park Service regulation, purporting to render the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 inapplicable to contracts entered into by concessioners... |
05/27/2003 | 02-196 |
CHAVEZ v. MARTINEZUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & ProcedureA 42 U.S.C. section 1983 plaintiff's Fifth Amendment rights were not violated through questioning by police, where he was never charged and no... |
05/27/2003 | 01-1444 |
NEVADA DEP'T OF HUMAN RES. v. HIBBSUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Government Benefits, Government Law, Labor & Employment LawEmployees of the state of Nevada may recover money damages in the event of the state's failure to comply with the family-care provision of the Family... |
05/27/2003 | 01-1368 |
CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. DAVIDUnited States Supreme Court
Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Government LawA city's failure to provide a sufficiently prompt hearing to recover money paid for a parking violation did not amount to a due process violation, as... |
05/19/2003 | 02-1212 |
INYO COUNTY v. PAIUTE-SHOSHONE INDIANS OF THE BISHOP CMTY.United States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Criminal Law & Procedure, Government Law, Indian LawAn Indian tribe did not qualify as a "person" who may sue under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, under the circumstances, in an action asserting sovereign... |
05/19/2003 | 02-281 |
BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC.United States Supreme Court
Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment LawA Fair Labor Standards Act provision stating that suit "may be maintained. . .in any Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction," 29 U.S.C.... |
05/19/2003 | 02-337 |
PHARM. RESEARCH & MFRS. OF AM. v. WALSHUnited States Supreme Court
Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Drugs & Biotech, Government Benefits, RemediesA preliminary injunction preventing implementation of a state program reducing prescription drug prices for state residents was improper, where an... |
05/19/2003 | 01-188 |
PRICE v. VINCENTUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusMichigan Supreme Court's finding, that a judge's comments were not sufficiently final to terminate jeopardy, was not contrary to or an unreasonable... |
05/19/2003 | 02-524 |
Results 1 to 10 of 12