United States Supreme Court
PRICE v. VINCENT, 02-524
Michigan Supreme Court's finding, that a judge's comments were not sufficiently final to terminate jeopardy, was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Federal circuit court erred in reviewing Double Jeopardy issue de novo, and finding that habeas relief was warranted.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/19/2003
- Published 05/19/2003
Judges
Court
- United States Supreme Court