United States Supreme Court - May 2002 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 11
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
BELL v. CONEUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingState court's finding, that defense counsel's failure to present mitigating evidence against imposition of the death penalty, and waiver of final... |
05/28/2002 | 01-400 |
FESTO CORP. v. SHOKETSU KINZOKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI CO., LTD.United States Supreme Court
Intellectual Property, PatentProsecution history estoppel may apply to any claim amendment made to satisfy the Patent Act's requirements, not just to amendments made to avoid the... |
05/28/2002 | 00-1543 |
FEDERAL MAR. COMM'N v. S. CAROLINA STATE PORTS AUTH.United States Supreme Court
Administrative Law, Admiralty, Constitutional LawState sovereign immunity bars the Federal Maritime Commission from adjudicating a private party's complaint against the South Carolina State Ports... |
05/28/2002 | 01-46 |
GISBRECHT v. BARNHARTUnited States Supreme Court
Attorney's Fees, Government Benefits42 U.S.C. section 406(b)(1)(A), authorizing that an attorney representing a Social Security claimant receive 25 percent of "past-due" benefits... |
05/28/2002 | 01-131 |
ALABAMA v. SHELTONUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingA suspended sentence which may result in deprivation of liberty may not be imposed unless the defendant was accorded the assistance of counsel in the... |
05/20/2002 | 00-1214 |
VERIZON MARYLAND INC. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM'N OF MARYLANDUnited States Supreme Court
Civil Procedure, Communications Law, Constitutional Law, Public UtilitiesJurisdiction is found under 28 U.S.C. section 1331, for a local-exchange carrier's claim that a state public utility commission's order, requiring... |
05/20/2002 | 00-1531 |
US v. COTTONUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingOmission from a federal indictment of a fact enhancing the statutory maximum sentence (here quantity of drugs) does not justify a court of appeals to... |
05/20/2002 | 01-687 |
CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. ALAMEDA BOOKS, INC.United States Supreme Court
Constitutional LawCity may reasonably rely on a 1977 study, showing increased crime rates in an area with the largest concentration of adult establishments, to... |
05/13/2002 | 00-799 |
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FED. COMMUNICATIONS COMM'NUnited States Supreme Court
Communications Law, Public UtilitiesThe FCC can require state utility commissions to set rates charged by incumbent telephone service carriers for leased elements on a forward-looking... |
05/13/2002 | 00-511 |
ASHCROFT v. AMER. CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONUnited States Supreme Court
Constitutional Law, Cyberspace LawThe Child Online Protection Act's (COPA) use of "community standards" to identify what material "is harmful to minors" does not by itself render the... |
05/13/2002 | 00-1293 |
Results 1 to 10 of 11