United States Supreme Court - January 2002 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 11
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
KANSAS v. CRANEUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & ProcedureA state must show that a sexual offender lacks some ability to control his violent behavior to justify confining him under its sexually violent... |
01/22/2002 | 00-957 |
LEE v. KEMNAUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusFailure of a criminal defendant to make a written motion for continuance under Missouri Court Rule 24.09 does not constitute adequate state grounds to... |
01/22/2002 | 00-6933 |
NAT'L CABLE & TELECOMM. ASS'N, INC. v. GULF POWER CO.United States Supreme Court
Communications Law, Cyberspace Law47 USC 224(b) of the Pole Attachments Act, which requires the Federal Communications Commission to set reasonable rates for attachments to telephone... |
01/16/2002 | 00-832 |
US v. ARVIZUUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & ProcedureUnder the totality of the circumstances test for investigatory stops, an officer may rely on combination of otherwise innocent observations to briefly... |
01/15/2002 | 00-1519 |
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMM'N v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.United States Supreme Court
Labor & Employment LawArbitration agreement between employer and employee for employment related disputes does not preclude the EEOC from seeking judicial relief on the... |
01/15/2002 | 99-1823 |
THOMAS v. CHICAGO PARK DIST.United States Supreme Court
Constitutional LawA content-neutral permit scheme regulating uses of a public forum need not have procedural safeguards required for subject matter speech regulations. |
01/15/2002 | 00-1249 |
KELLY v. S. CAROLINAUnited States Supreme Court
Criminal Law & ProcedureEvidence of defendant's violent conduct in prison is relevant to issue of defendant's future danger to society in death penalty cases, such that... |
01/09/2002 | 00-9280 |
CHAO v. MALLARD BAY DRILLING, INC.United States Supreme Court
Admiralty, Labor & Employment LawCoast Guard's refusal to regulate working conditions on "uninspected vessels" does not preclude OSHA regulations on those vessels. |
01/09/2002 | 00-927 |
DUSENBERY v. USUnited States Supreme Court
Asset Forfeiture, Constitutional LawIn an asset forfeiture proceeding, where the government sends notice of forfeiture proceeding by certified mail to prisoner in prison that has a... |
01/08/2002 | 00-6567 |
TOYOTA MOTOR MFG., KENTUCKY, INC. v. WILLIAMSUnited States Supreme Court
Labor & Employment LawTo be "substantially limited in a major life activity" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, an individual must have an impairment that prevents... |
01/08/2002 | 00-1089.html |
Results 1 to 10 of 11