United States Federal Circuit - August 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 4
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 31
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
EMERY WORLDWIDE AIRLINES, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Administrative Law, Government ContractsBecause previous experience showed that a competitive bidding process would take much longer to perform than negotiating a sole-source award and would... |
08/31/2001 | 01-5075 |
HEARTLAND BY-PRODUCTS, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International TradeThe United States Customs Service classification of certain sugar syrup under subheadings 1702.90.10/20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the... |
08/30/2001 | 00-1287; 00-1289 |
TURBOCARE DIV. OF DEMAG DELAVAL TURBOMACHINERY CORP. v. GEN. ELEC. CO.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the specification makes clear that the claim term was used to denote structure, not function, the claim is not in means-plus-function form and... |
08/29/2001 | 00-1349 |
ALEXANDER v US POSTAL SERV.United States Federal Circuit
Labor & Employment LawWhere the agreement to waive the right to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board specifies only one incident and effect, the employee has not... |
08/29/2001 | 00-3415 |
SKF USA INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, International TradeThe US Department of Commerce must adequately explain why it has interpreted the phrase "foreign like product" one way when making price-based... |
08/24/2001 | 00-1423; 00-1465 |
AM. EXPRESS CO. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Tax LawThe IRS's own Revenue Procedure does not contain statutes, so courts may defer to the IRS interpretation of terms without the need for Chevron... |
08/23/2001 | 00-5111 |
WINBOND ELECS. CORP. v. INT'L TRADE COMM'NUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the patent owner offered an industry-wide royalty-free license if the industry adopted the patent as an industry standard, but the industry... |
08/22/2001 | 01-1031; 01-1032; 01-1034; 01-1128 |
MCGINLEY v. FRANKLIN SPORTS, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent35 USC 112 guarantees drafters of means-plus-function claim limitations a range of equivalents extending beyond that which is explicitly disclosed in... |
08/21/2001 | 00-1324; 01-1113 |
ROTHE DEV. CORP. v. US DEP'T OF DEF.United States Federal Circuit
Constitutional Law, Government ContractsThe National Defense Authorization Act of 1987, 10 USC 2323, which permits the United States Department of Defense to preferentially select bids... |
08/20/2001 | 00-1171 |
GLAXO GROUP LTD. v. RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the product for which defendant seeks FDA approval contains a higher crystalline content than the "crystalline free" product of plaintiff's,... |
08/20/2001 | 01-1151 |
Results 1 to 10 of 31