Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - January 2002 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 11
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
JOHNSON v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & ProcedureWhere the state advanced race-neutral reasons for exercising a peremptory challenge against a juror, and the appellant failed to prove that the... |
01/30/2002 | 73,765 |
COOPER v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
EvidenceThe natural inference that arises when a theft immediately follows an assault, i.e., that the assault was committed "in the course of committing... |
01/30/2002 | 2055-00 |
HULL v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureAppellant waived his complaint regarding the trial court-s "zero tolerance" probation policy by failing to raise the complaint when probation... |
01/30/2002 | 1812-00 |
MITCHELL v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureAppellant failed to establish that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney permitted him to wear the same shirt during voir... |
01/30/2002 | 1485-00 |
FRYER v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingBecause Article 42.12, section 9(a) of Texas- Code of Criminal Procedure allows the inclusion, in a presentencing (PSI) investigation report, of any... |
01/30/2002 | 1474-99 |
DONOVAN v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureAppellant who wished to challenge the voluntariness of his plea in a motion for new trial setting had to first move for adjudication of charges... |
01/30/2002 | 1310-00 |
WHEELER v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceIn defendant-s trial for aggravated sexual assault of a child, it was not an abuse of discretion to allow the cross-examination of a Child Protective... |
01/30/2002 | 815-99 |
HALL v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant who was only "mildly retarded" may still be subject to the death penalty under Texas law. |
01/16/2002 | 73,787 |
McCAIN v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusAlthough article 1.13(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure states that the trial court "must" appoint an attorney to represent a felony... |
01/09/2002 | 1727-00 |
EX PARTE GRAVESCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusAn allegation in a subsequent writ application that prior habeas corpus counsel was not "competent," under article 11.071, section 2(a) of the Texas... |
01/03/2002 | 73927a.htm |
Results 1 to 10 of 11