Supreme Court of California - May 2014 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 8 of 8
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long BeachSupreme Court of California
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government Law, Media LawThe Court of Appeal properly upheld the trial court's denial of plaintiff-police union's request for a permanent injunction to prevent the release of... |
05/29/2014 | S200872 |
Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.Supreme Court of California
Labor & Employment Law, Class Actions, EvidenceIn a wage and hour class action brought by plaintiff-loan officers for defendant, who sued for unpaid overtime, claiming they had been misclassified... |
05/29/2014 | S200923 |
People v. ScottSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingThe Realignment Act is not applicable to defendants whose state prison sentences were imposed and suspended prior to October 1, 2011. Upon revocation... |
05/19/2014 | S211670 |
Marriage of ValliSupreme Court of California
Family Law, Insurance LawWhere a husband, during a marriage, uses community property funds to purchase an insurance policy on his life, naming his wife as the policy's only... |
05/15/2014 | S193990 |
People v. GutierrezSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, Juvenile LawDefendant-juveniles' convictions of special circumstance murder and sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole are reversed in... |
05/05/2014 | S206365A |
People v. ChismSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, EvidenceIn an automatic appeal in a death penalty case, defendant's conviction and capital sentence for first degree murder, attempted robbery, and second... |
05/05/2014 | S101984 |
People v. HajekSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, EvidenceIn an automatic appeal in two death penalty cases, defendants' convictions and capital sentences for first degree murder, premeditated attempted... |
05/05/2014 | S049626 |
Loeffler v. Target CorporationSupreme Court of California
Administrative Law, Class Actions, Constitutional Law, Consumer Protection Law, Tax LawDismissal of an action brought by plaintiff-consumers seeking a refund of allegedly unlawful sales tax charges on defendant's sales of hot coffee sold... |
05/01/2014 | S173972 |
Results 1 to 8 of 8