Supreme Court of California - May 2004 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 9 of 9
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
THE PEOPLE v. CANTYSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant is not entitled to probation and drug treatment diversion under Proposition 36 because she was convicted in the same proceeding of a... |
05/27/2004 | S109537 |
IN RE S.B.Supreme Court of California
Family Law, Juvenile LawThe mother's failure to challenge the visitation order in juvenile court did not preclude the Court of Appeal from considering the issue, and the... |
05/27/2004 | S112260 |
GAVALDON v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORP.Supreme Court of California
Consumer Protection Law, RemediesA service contract, purchased to supplement the factory warranty accompanying the purchase of a new automobile, is not an express warranty within the... |
05/27/2004 | S104477 |
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KINGS COUNTYSupreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort LawFailure to allege facts demonstrating or excusing compliance with the claim presentation requirements of the California Tort Claims Act, Government... |
05/24/2004 | S114171 |
THE PEOPLE v. DELOUIZESupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureA trial court retains jurisdiction to reconsider an order granting a new trial, and to reinstate a jury's verdict. |
05/24/2004 | S108119 |
PEOPLE v. POLLOCKSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingJudgment of death is affirmed on automatic appeal. No prejudice resulted from the erroneous penalty phase instruction on defendant's possession of... |
05/17/2004 | S040471 |
HAYNES v. FARMERS INS. EXCH.Supreme Court of California
Insurance LawThe permissive user limitation in defendant's "E-Z Reader Car Policy" - purporting to limit to the legal minimum any coverage for permissive users of... |
05/17/2004 | S104851 |
PEOPLE v. LENARTSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingDeath row inmate's conviction and sentence are affirmed on automatic appeal. |
05/06/2004 | S049389 |
WIENER v. SOUTHCOAST CHILDCARE CTRS., INC.Supreme Court of California
Injury & Tort LawChild care center and its owner are not liable in tort for a third party's intentional criminal act against the center's children when there had been... |
05/06/2004 | S116358 |
Results 1 to 9 of 9