Supreme Court of California

Defendant is not entitled to probation and drug treatment diversion under Proposition 36 because she was convicted in the same proceeding of a misdemeanor not related to the use of drugs or any felony.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/27/2004
• Published 05/27/2004

Judges

• GEORGE, C.J.

Court

• Supreme Court of California

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Sandra Gillies and Bradley A. Bristow, Sacramento, under appointments by the Supreme Court, and Valerie G. Wass, Pasadena, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez, Marc J. Nolan, Janet E. Neeley and Tiffany S. Shultz, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.