Supreme Court of California - February 2002 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 8 of 8
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
HESS v. FORD MOTOR CO.Supreme Court of California
Injury & Tort LawIf a plaintiff's release agreement, entered into with one tortfeasor and his insurance company, contains broad language releasing all potential... |
02/28/2002 | S092697 |
MANDULEY v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (PEOPLE)Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile LawWelfare and Institutions Code section 707(d), a product of Proposition 21, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998, is... |
02/28/2002 | S095992 |
CORREA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY (PEOPLE)Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceA generally unbiased and adequately skilled translator simply serves as a "language conduit," so that the translated statement is considered to be the... |
02/25/2002 | S093476 |
PEOPLE v. HILLHOUSESupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureEvidence that victim may have been dead prior to his transport was insufficient to support a kidnapping for robbery conviction and kidnapping-murder... |
02/25/2002 | S029384 |
KEENAN v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (SINATRA)Supreme Court of California
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, Entertainment LawThe storytelling provision of California's "Son of Sam law," Civil Code section 2225(b)(1), which appropriates, as compensation for crime victims, all... |
02/21/2002 | S080284 |
PEOPLE v. CROSSDALESupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureA first offense for obtaining telephone services by fraud, Penal Code section 502.7(a), cannot be punished as a felony if the amount of the loss does... |
02/21/2002 | S097222 |
HARTWELL CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA COUNTY (AMARIA)Supreme Court of California
Public UtilitiesThe Public Utility Commission's regulation of water quality and safety does not preempt damage claims, alleging violations of federal and state... |
02/04/2002 | S082782 |
AMELCO ELEC. v. CITY OF THOUSAND OAKSSupreme Court of California
Government ContractsThe abandonment of contract theory does not apply against a public entity, and plaintiff public works contractor failed to adduce sufficient evidence... |
02/04/2002 | S091069 |
Results 1 to 8 of 8