Supreme Court of California - July 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 17
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
DONOVAN v. RRL CORP.Supreme Court of California
ContractsA typographical error in a newspaper advertisement for the price of a car may constitute a valid contract under Vehicle Code section 11713.1(e), but a... |
07/30/2001 | S082570 |
MONTENEGRO v. DIAZSupreme Court of California
Family LawA stipulated custody order is a final judicial custody determination for purposes of the changed circumstance rule only if there is a clear,... |
07/30/2001 | S090699 |
PEOPLE v. TREVINOSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, Habeas CorpusUnder Penal Code section 190.2(a)(2), a prior-murder special-circumstance finding may be based on an offense committed in another jurisdiction if,... |
07/26/2001 | S085410 |
PEOPLE v. OTTOSupreme Court of California
Civil Rights, EvidenceWelfare and Institutions Code 6600(a)(3), which permits details of predicate offenses to be proven by documentary evidence in a sexually violent... |
07/23/2001 | S088807 |
PEOPLE v. TOLEDOSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedurePenal Code section 422, which makes it a crime to willfully threaten to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another... |
07/23/2001 | S089957 |
PEARL v. WORKERS- COMP. APPEALS BD.Supreme Court of California
Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationGovernment Code section 20046, a provision of the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and not Labor Code section 3208.3, governs whether the disability... |
07/19/2001 | S090553 |
PEOPLE v. MITCHELLSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureIf the Attorney General, in responding to a criminal defendant's appeal, points out a discrepancy between the trial court's judgment and the abstract... |
07/19/2001 | S090791 |
PEOPLE v. CATLINSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureA nine-year delay between homicide and prosecution for murder by poison is justified where forensic technology did not exist to establish cause of... |
07/16/2001 | S016718 |
STYNE v. STEVENSSupreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Entertainment LawUnder Labor Code section 1700.44(c), the one-year limitations period contained in the Talent Agencies Act does not prevent an entertainer from... |
07/12/2001 | S086787 |
CORNETTE v. DEP'T OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of California
Injury & Tort LawA plaintiff has a right to a jury trial as to the issues involved in loss of design immunity. |
07/12/2001 | S089010 |
Results 1 to 10 of 17