Supreme Court of California - June 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 12
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. RUSSOSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureA conviction for conspiracy does not require the jury to agree on a specific overt act as long as it unanimously finds beyond a reasonable doubt that... |
06/28/2001 | S088368 |
HARROTT v. COUNTY OF KINGSSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureUnder the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989, a superior court does not have the authority to declare a rifle to be an "AK series"... |
06/28/2001 | S055064 |
PEOPLE v. MCCOYSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureAn aider and abettor may be guilty of greater homicide-related offenses than those which a jury found the actual perpetrator committed. |
06/25/2001 | S087893 |
PRICE v. SUPERIOR COURT (PEOPLE)Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedurePenal Code section 784.7 properly permits the trial of more than one of several offenses in any county in which one of the offenses occurred because... |
06/25/2001 | S085852 |
ESTATE OF GRISWOLD v. SEESupreme Court of California
Property Law & Real EstateProbate Code section 6452 does not bar the half siblings from sharing in the intestate estate of a decedent born out of wedlock where the record is... |
06/22/2001 | S087881 |
ESTATE OF GRISWOLD v. SEESupreme Court of California
Probate Code section 6452 does not bar the half siblings from sharing in the intestate estate of a decedent born out of wedlock where the record is... |
06/22/2001 | S087881 |
PEOPLE v. CHEEKSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureUnder Welf. & Inst. Code 6605, defendants committed under the Sexually Violent Predators Act have the right to call witnesses and to cross-examine... |
06/21/2001 | S083305 |
PEOPLE v. CUNNINGHAMSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureTrial court may conduct a death-penalty specific voir dire prior to guilt phase of trial. |
06/21/2001 | S010856 |
PEOPLE v. ANSELLSupreme Court of California
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & ProcedureA postcrime amendment which restricts the availability of a certificate of rehabilitation under Penal Code section 4852.01 et seq. does not violate... |
06/14/2001 | S079744 |
AGUILAR v. ATL. RICHFIELD CO.Supreme Court of California
Civil ProcedureSummary judgment law does not require a plaintiff moving for summary judgment to disprove any defense asserted by the defendant as well as prove each... |
06/14/2001 | S086738 |
Results 1 to 10 of 12