Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Supreme Court of California - May 2001 Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 1 of 2 Showing Result 1 - 10 of 12
Description Date Docket #

PEOPLE v. GARCIA

Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure
Penal Code section 290 requires showing that defendant actually knew of the requirement to register as a sex offender, but even though the court erred...
05/31/2001 S081934

SAELZLER v. ADVANCED GROUP 400

Supreme Court of California
Injury & Tort Law
In order to recover from apartment owners for damages caused by the criminal actions of third parties, plaintiff must demonstrate that defendants-...
05/31/2001 S085736

PEOPLE v. SUPERIOR COURT (LAFF)

Supreme Court of California
Civil Procedure
A superior court possesses inherent authority to appoint a special master to assist it in determining claims of privilege regarding materials seized...
05/24/2001 S063662

GRISET v. FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM'N

Supreme Court of California
Civil Procedure
Court of Appeal lacks authority to entertain a second appeal in the same action, to again consider the constitutionality of a law after the state...
05/24/2001 S077219

PEOPLE v. TORRES

Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure
The Sexually Violent Predators Act, Welf. & Inst. Code 6600 et seq., does not require the trier of fact to find that the defendant-s prior sexual...
05/21/2001 S079575

PEOPLE v. LEWIS

Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure
Code of Civil Procedure section 232 requires prospective jurors to take the jurors' oath before answering the written questionnaires, but failure to...
05/17/2001 S018665

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON

Supreme Court of California
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
Where defendant's expert can only speculate as to the cause of minority underrepresentation in the jury pool, and the jury commissioner's procedures...
05/14/2001 S020378

HOECHST CELANESE CORP. v. FRANCHISE TAX BD.

Supreme Court of California
Tax Law
A reversion of surplus pension plan assets is taxable by California as apportionable business income.
05/14/2001 s085091

BLUE RIDGE INS. CO. v. JACOBSEN

Supreme Court of California
Insurance Law
An insurer defending a personal injury suit under a reservation of rights may recover settlement payments made over the objection of the insured when...
05/10/2001 S083934

PEOPLE v. CLEVELAND

Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure
A juror in criminal case who expressly refused to follow the trial court's instructions because the juror disagreed with the law criminalizing such...
05/07/2001 S078537

Results 1 to 10 of 12

Copied to clipboard