California Court of Appeal - June 2005 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 10
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 93
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
In re Brent F.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile LawThe juvenile court erred when it committed a minor to the California Youth Authority pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 778. |
06/30/2005 | C043156 |
Bernard v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal
Health Law, Probate, Trusts & EstatesDefendants are care custodians within the meaning of Probate Code section 21350 since they provided health services to decedent and, consequently,... |
06/30/2005 | B168665 |
Sorthington v. Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal
Gaming Law, Government Contracts, Government Law, Indian LawDefendant-City's resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding, concerning a casino project, is not subject to the referendum process. |
06/30/2005 | A107547 |
In re S.B.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Indian Law, Juvenile LawTermination of a mother's parental rights is affirmed over her claim that the juvenile court and social worker complied only belatedly with their duty... |
06/30/2005 | E036823 |
Hasler v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal
Attorney's FeesUnder Hsu v. Abbara (1995) 9 Cal.4th 863, a prevailing party is not entitled to attorney's fees simply because the opposing party requested them. |
06/30/2005 | B180106 |
In re Javier G.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Family Law, Juvenile LawJurisdictional findings on a Welfare and Institutions Code section 387 petition are interlocutory and nonappealable. |
06/30/2005 | D045617 |
Anderson First Coalition v. City of AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal
Construction, Environmental Law, Government LawIn an action challenging the approval of a shopping center project, the trial court improperly denied plaintiff's petition regarding the project's... |
06/30/2005 | C047605 |
People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceDefendant's conviction for receiving stolen property is affirmed over his claims that 1)the evidence was insufficient, 2)he was deprived a fair trial... |
06/30/2005 | E035829 |
County of Los Angeles v. Super. Ct. of L.A.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, EvidenceClosed session minutes are specifically exempt from disclosure by Government Code section 54957.2. Therefore, respondent court erred when it granted... |
06/29/2005 | B182464 |
Ridgecrest Charter Sch. v. Sierra Sands Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal
Education LawA school district's exercise of its discretion in responding to a Proposition 39 facilities request must comport with the evident purpose of the... |
06/29/2005 | F045114 |
Results 1 to 10 of 93