California Court of Appeal - February 2003 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 8
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 75
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
MELCHIOR v. NEW LINE PRODUCTIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Entertainment Law
When a motion picture production company accepted the benefits of a Release Agreement, it also assumed the obligations of the agreement, including the...
|
02/28/2003 | B153239 |
NAVELLIER v. SLETTENCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Contracts
Where plaintiffs have not established a probability of prevailing on their fraud or breach of contract claims as required by the second prong of the...
|
02/28/2003 | A090058 |
CONSUMER CAUSE, INC. v. ARKOPHARMA, INC.California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection Law, Drugs & Biotech, Health Law
(Industry: Consumer Products, Food & Beverage) Liquid products containing herbal, botanical, floral, and similar extracts are not fit for beverage purposes and they are not "alcoholic beverages,"...
|
02/28/2003 | B157805 |
PEOPLE v. CAMPBELLCalifornia Court of Appeal
Corporation & Enterprise Law, Sentencing
When a probationer commits both qualifying and nonqualifying offenses or probation violations, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000,...
|
02/28/2003 | H023299 |
COURT HOUSE PLAZA CO. v. GOODENOUGHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Plaintiff could not adequately demonstrate that it was a third party beneficiary, thus it has no standing to enforce the lease provision barring...
|
02/28/2003 | h023883 |
CITY OF HALF MOON BAY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY (YAMAGIWA)California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Environmental Law, Government Law, Property Law & Real Estate
The California Coastal Commission does not have appellate jurisdiction to modify a local government's permit approval that was issued solely to comply...
|
02/28/2003 | A100099 |
PEOPLE v. LEDESMACalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Particular facts known to the officers, when evaluated in light of their training and experience, justified the protective sweep of a room in which...
|
02/28/2003 | A097337 |
IN RE JENNINGSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus
(Industry: Food & Beverage) In order to violate Business and Professions Code section 25658(c), which prohibits furnishing alcohol those under 21 who thereafter cause injury or...
|
02/28/2003 | C041479 |
IN RE MARRIAGE OF LOYDCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law
Where the trial court based its decision to modify a custody arrangement on an improper consideration, the court's new order, which modified the prior...
|
02/28/2003 | F040008 |
PEOPLE v. BRACAMONTECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
The trial court erred in (1) failing to stay a four-year term for defendants' robbery convictions, and (2) in its disposition of the firearm discharge...
|
02/27/2003 | B151466 |