California Court of Appeal

Because there is insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that a child is not adoptable, the order of the juvenile court following a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 selection and implementation hearing, in which it selected a permanent plan of legal guardianship, is reversed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/27/2003
• Published 02/27/2003

Judges

• DOI TODD, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Lloyd W. Pellman, County Counsel, and Pamela S. Landeros, Deputy County Counsel for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Janette Freeman Cochran, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Pasadena, for Defendant and Respondent Maria G., Melissa A. Chaitin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent Nelson V.