| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
TUCKER LAND CO. v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Constituent members of a Joint Powers Agency (JPA), created by a joint powers agreement pursuant to Government Code section 6500 et seq., are not...
|
12/28/2001 | B146384 |
BURNS v. NATURE'S BESTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
An instruction that precludes the jury from considering whether a plaintiff had an expectation that a taped telephone conversation would be repeated...
|
12/28/2001 | G023339 |
IN RE: MARRIAGE OF VROENENCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law
The defense of estoppel based on concealment of children is not available if the concealment ended when the children were still minors.
|
12/27/2001 | A094067 |
LOHNES v. ASTRON COMPUTER PRODUCTSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
Intervener-s reliance on and compliance with the court clerk-s accepted practice, cannot serve as a basis for the court-s order striking the complaint...
|
12/27/2001 | G025519 |
CPI BUILDERS, INC. v. IMPCO TECH, INC.California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
A binding contract to arbitrate is valid where one party signs the document but withdraws its consent after the other party accepts the offer.
|
12/27/2001 | G026579 |
IN RE: MARRIAGE OF CROSSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law
Neither husband nor the community has a right to reimbursement from improvements made to wife's seperate property made with his seperate funds.
|
12/27/2001 | E029861 |
HAMEID v. NAT'L FIRE INS. OF HARTFORDCalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, Insurance Law
Insurance company has a duty to defend under an advertising injury provision of a policy, even if the advertising in question is small.
|
12/27/2001 | G026525 |
PEOPLE v. ENGCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
The Coast Guard's below-deck search of a boat conducted pursuant to a "search and rescue" does not violate a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights.
|
12/27/2001 | A094853 |
ESTATE OF KAILACalifornia Court of Appeal
Evidence
Extrinsic evidence is admissable to show ambiguities and interpret no-contest clauses in wills.
|
12/27/2001 | D036065 |
JACKSON v. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Public Utilities
A utility is immune, under Civil Code section 846, from suit by a child who suffered injuries when he attempted to retrieve his kite from an overhead...
|
12/26/2001 | A091784 |