California Court of Appeal - November 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 7
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 68
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. JOHN Z.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe crime of forcible rape, Pen. Code, 261 (2), may be committed where a woman consents to initial penetration by the male but the woman withdraws... |
11/30/2001 | C036210 |
ROE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal
Antitrust & Trade RegulationGovernment breach of settlement agreement in licensing discipline case is subject to a breach of contract claim and not subject to the immunity... |
11/30/2001 | A093755 |
LOS ANGELES POLICE PROTECTIVE LEAGUE v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment LawLabor agreement with city employer that excluded employee transfers from arbitration trumps a city administrative ordinance that provided for... |
11/30/2001 | B146712 |
MORRIS v. HARPERCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Health LawFailure of California Youth Authority director to license correctional treatment centers, under Health & Saf. Code 1250 (j)(1), 1253, after five... |
11/30/2001 | A093703 |
BROWN v. KENNARDCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawLitigation privilege under Civil Code section 47(b) precludes an abuse of process action alleging defendant wrongfully levied exempt property while... |
11/30/2001 | C037480 |
WILLIAMS v. SUPERIOR COURT (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureProposition 21 does not violate the single-subject rule contained in the California Constitution, article II, section 8, subdivision (d). |
11/29/2001 | D038141 |
DEP'T OF HEALTH SERVS. v. SUPERIOR COURT (MCGINNIS)California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment LawBurlington/Faragher defense to Title VII sexual harassment claims is unavailable against a similar claim under California's Fair Employment and... |
11/29/2001 | C034163 |
IN RE HARRY N.California Court of Appeal
Family LawUnder Welfare and Institutions Code 366.26(k)), the "preference" for the caretaker family applies only to preference in processing an adoption... |
11/28/2001 | B145977 |
IN RE CLIFTON V.California Court of Appeal
Family LawA mother is entitled to have live witness testimony at a petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, where there is a... |
11/28/2001 | B148437 |
WALKER v. KIOUSISCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawCivil Code section 47.5, which allows a peace officer to bring a defamation action against an individual who knowingly and maliciously files a false... |
11/28/2001 | E029822 |
Results 1 to 10 of 68