WILLIAMS v. SUPERIOR COURT (PEOPLE), D038141
Proposition 21 does not violate the single-subject rule contained in the California Constitution, article II, section 8, subdivision (d).
- Decided 11/28/2001
- Published 11/29/2001
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Steven J. Carroll, Public Defender, Gary R. Nichols, Jo Pastore, Robert Rexrode, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner., John T. Philipsborn, San Francisco, for California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, upon the request of the Court of Appeal, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner., Paul J. Pfingst, District Attorney, Thomas F. McArdle and Anthony Lovett, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Laura Whitcomb Halgren and Patti W. Ranger, Deputy Attorneys General, upon the request of the Court of Appeal, as Amicus Curiae., Gary T. Yancey, District Attorney (Contra Costa) and L. Douglas Pipes, Deputy District Attorney for the California District Attorneys Association, upon the request of the Court of Appeal, as Amicus Curiae.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance by Respondent.