California Court of Appeal - July 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 8
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 75
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. YOUNGBLOODCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureAnimal cruelty under Penal Code 597(b) requires a showing that defendant deprived animals of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter or subjected them... |
07/31/2001 | C033929 |
PETROPOULOS v. PETROPOULOSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawThe 2000 version of Family Code 3653(c), which allows the court to order repayment of excess support following a retroactive reduction, applies... |
07/31/2001 | H020650 |
IN RE: NICHOLAS H.California Court of Appeal
Family LawUnder Fam. Code 7611, putative father's admission that he is not the biological father of a child is sufficient to rebut his status as a presumed... |
07/31/2001 | A092188/A093477 |
FORD v. SUPERIOR COURT (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhere defendant called police, volunteered to go to police station and willingly cooperated with every police request while at the station, he was not... |
07/31/2001 | A094667 |
GLENDALE MEM'L HOSP. & HEALTH CTR. v. DEP'T OF MENTAL HEALTHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Health LawUnder CCR 1774, the Department of Mental Health's boilerplate denials of requests for hospital reimbursement for mental health services are... |
07/31/2001 | B127829 |
THOMPSON v. SUPERIOR COURT (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureCalifornia law does not require proof of Three Strikes prior convictions at preliminary hearings, and Apprendi did not alter this principle. |
07/31/2001 | B144625 |
HANSON v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SISKIYOU COUNTYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Habeas CorpusWhen a judge, who directly witnesses offending behavior, refers a contempt hearing to another judge, it is a case of indirect contempt and not a case... |
07/31/2001 | C037518 |
BALTAYAN v. GETEMYANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil ProcedurePlaintiff's successful application for in forma pauperis status required trial court to vacate order requiring him to post an undertaking pursuant to... |
07/30/2001 | B136807 |
FINEGAN v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment LawThe prohibition on using after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination cases does not apply when the employer offers expert medical testimony... |
07/30/2001 | B134878 |
GERMAN v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureRetrying a defendant for conspiracy to commit first degree murder, after his conviction for conspiracy to commit second degree murder was reversed on... |
07/30/2001 | B148154 |
Results 1 to 10 of 75