Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Pinky Monteiro, appellant, v. Rasraj Foods & Catering, Inc., respondent.
Submitted-October 21, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (J. Golia, J.), dated August 24, 2009, as granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was to refer the action to the Workers' Compensation Board of the State of New York, referred the issues of whether she was the defendant's employee at the time of her alleged accident, whether she was injured in the course of her employment with the defendant, and whether the defendant provided the appropriate worker's compensation insurance coverage for her, and stayed the action pending determination of these issues, and (2) from an order of the same court dated February 9, 2010, which denied her motion for leave to reargue her opposition to that branch of the defendant's motion which was to refer the action to the Workers' Compensation Board of the State of New York.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated February 9, 2010, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages alleging that she sustained injuries while employed by the defendant, and that the defendant had failed to provide her with workers' compensation insurance coverage.
The defendant moved, inter alia, to refer the action to the Workers' Compensation Board of the State of New York (hereinafter the Board). The Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was to refer the action to the Board, referred the issues of whether the plaintiff was the defendant's employee at the time of her alleged accident, whether she was injured in the course of her employment with the defendant, and whether the defendant provided the appropriate worker's compensation insurance coverage for her, and stayed the action pending determination of these issues.
Since “primary jurisdiction with respect to determinations as to the applicability of the Workers' Compensation Law has been vested in the Workers' Compensation Board,” it is “inappropriate for the courts to express views with respect thereto pending determination by the board” (Botwinick v. Ogden, 59 N.Y.2d 909, 911). Where, as here, the existence of an employer-employee relationship presents a question of fact, that question is properly resolved in the first instance by the Board, as is the question of whether the alleged injury was sustained in the course of employment (see O'Rourke v. Long, 41 N.Y.2d 219, 224, 227-228). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly referred the action to the Board for a determination as to whether the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant at the time of the alleged accident and whether the accident occurred in the course of the plaintiff's employment with the defendant.
PRUDENTI, P.J., COVELLO, FLORIO and BELEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-09709 2010-04742 (Index No. 9215/08)
Decided: December 14, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)