Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Donna McGHEE, appellant, v. James McGHEE, respondent.
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated February 3, 1998, which, inter alia, granted the defendant a divorce on the ground of constructive abandonment.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion when, immediately after granting a motion by former counsel for the plaintiff wife to withdraw from the case, it took both parties by surprise by proceeding to an inquest on all matters arising in the divorce action without permitting a reasonable adjournment (cf., Matter of DeMarco v. Raftery, 242 A.D.2d 625, 662 N.Y.S.2d 138; Matter of Millay v. Millay, 226 A.D.2d 728, 641 N.Y.S.2d 699; Kalra v. Kalra, 170 A.D.2d 579, 566 N.Y.S.2d 356; Stock v. Stock, 127 A.D.2d 829, 511 N.Y.S.2d 943; Tesoriero v. Tesoriero, 114 A.D.2d 1027, 495 N.Y.S.2d 465; Cuevas v. Cuevas, 110 A.D.2d 873, 488 N.Y.S.2d 725; cf., CPLR 321[c] ). Moreover, the court erred in granting the defendant husband a divorce on his counterclaim alleging constructive abandonment. The defendant's testimony at the hearing was insufficient to establish that he had made repeated efforts to resume sexual relations with the plaintiff that were rebuffed (see, Schildkraut v. Schildkraut, 223 A.D.2d 585, 636 N.Y.S.2d 411; Lyons v. Lyons, 187 A.D.2d 415, 589 N.Y.S.2d 557; Caprise v. Caprise, 143 A.D.2d 968, 533 N.Y.S.2d 622).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 26, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)