Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Julius ABBATE, et al., Appellants, v. Edward LISS, Respondent.

Decided: June 25, 2001

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, and STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ. Deren, Genett & Macreery, P.C., Katonah, N.Y. (John Brian Macreery of counsel), for appellants. O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle & Oleson, White Plains, N.Y. (Montgomery L. Effinger of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), dated May 4, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the jury verdict in favor of the defendant was not against the weight of the evidence.   The defendant, who was the driver of the motor vehicle involved in the accident, testified that he was traveling at 20 miles per hour and did not see the injured plaintiff, who was riding a bicycle, before the impact.   The injured plaintiff testified that he did not come to a complete stop at the roadway, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1234(c).   Furthermore, photographs of the roadway depicted tall hedges lining the driveway, which would have obstructed the defendant's view of the injured plaintiff as he rode the bicycle down the driveway and towards the roadway.   On this evidence, the jury reasonably could have concluded that the defendant was not negligent (see, McKeaveney v. Reiffert, 268 A.D.2d 411, 702 N.Y.S.2d 318;  Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 495 N.Y.S.2d 184;  Justice v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 248 A.D.2d 443, 668 N.Y.S.2d 938).

The plaintiffs' remaining contention is without merit.

Copied to clipboard