Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NORTHWEST 5TH & 45TH REALTY CORP., Petitioner–Respondent, v. MITCHELL, MAXWELL & JACKSON, INC., et al., Respondents–Appellants, Jeffrey Jackson etc., et al., Respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered October 31, 2016, in petitioner's favor against respondent Steven Knobel in the amount of $661,526.64, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and respondents' cross motion to dismiss the petition granted.
In this special proceeding, petitioner seeks to enforce, against Knobel, two judgments that it obtained against respondent Mitchell, Maxwell & Jackson, Inc. (MMJ) in a plenary action. The petition invoked Debtor and Creditor Law § 273, which requires insolvency. The petition also quoted Debtor and Creditor Law § 271(1), which states, “A person is insolvent when the present fair salable value of his assets is less than the amount that will be required to pay his probable liability on his existing debts as they become absolute and matured.” Despite this, the petition made no allegations about the fair salable value of MMJ's assets; thus, it failed to make a prima facie case (see Kenyon & Kenyon LLP v. SightSound Tech., LLC, 151 A.D.3d 530, 531, 58 N.Y.S.3d 298 [1st Dept. 2017] ).
Because a special proceeding is treated like a summary judgment motion (see CPLR 409[b]; Matter of Port of N.Y. Auth. [62 Cortlandt St. Realty Co.], 18 N.Y.2d 250, 255, 273 N.Y.S.2d 337, 219 N.E.2d 797 [1966], cert denied sub nom. McInness v. Port of N.Y. Auth., 385 U.S. 1006, 87 S.Ct. 712, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 [1967] ), petitioner could not cure the deficiency of proof in its petition in reply (see Henry v. Peguero, 72 A.D.3d 600, 602, 900 N.Y.S.2d 49 [1st Dept. 2010], appeal dismissed 15 N.Y.3d 820, 908 N.Y.S.2d 152, 934 N.E.2d 886 [2010] ).
In addition to alleging fraudulent conveyance, the petition sought to pierce MMJ's corporate veil to hold Knobel (MMJ's 50% shareholder) liable for the judgment against MMJ. Such veil-piercing was neither factually nor legally justified in this case (see e.g. 210 E. 86th St. Corp. v. Grasso, 305 A.D.2d 156, 758 N.Y.S.2d 654 [1st Dept. 2003] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 6616
Decided: May 17, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)