Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sharon GIARDINA, Respondent, v. PARKVIEW COURT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., Robert Carney, a/k/a Robert Cramer, and Claire Carney, a/k/a Claire Cramer, Appellants.
Robert CARNEY, a/k/a Robert Cramer, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. O.M. SCOTT & SONS COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
PARKVIEW COURT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. SIBLEY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Parkview Court Homeowners' Association, Inc. to dismiss the complaint against it and the motion of defendants Robert Carney, a/k/a Robert Cramer, and Claire Carney, a/k/a Claire Cramer, and the cross motion of third-party defendant O.M. Scott & Sons Company (O.M. Scott) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against the Carneys. CPLR 214-c may not be invoked to bar plaintiff's action based upon Robert Carney's alleged trespass on plaintiff's property on April 11, 1988. Plaintiff's action based upon that trespass was timely commenced, and plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for any injuries that she can prove were attributable to that trespass.
O.M. Scott's reliance upon Jensen v. General Elec. Co., 82 N.Y.2d 77, 603 N.Y.S.2d 420, 623 N.E.2d 547, is misplaced. In Jensen, defendant General Electric Company had stopped dumping chemicals in 1969, plaintiffs discovered that their property was contaminated in 1986, and the Court of Appeals held that plaintiffs were required to commence an action within three years of discovery. The Court held that plaintiffs could not rely upon a continuous tort theory to extend the time within which the lawsuit must be commenced. Here, by contrast, plaintiff does not rely upon a continuous tort theory, but rather, alleges distinct acts of trespass by Robert Carney, the last of which occurred within the three-year Statute of Limitations.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)