Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
VIRGINIA EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS, INC. AND STARNET INSURANCE COMPANY/ BERKLEY NET UNDERWRITERS, LLC v. JOHNNY M. BRIGHT, SR.
Virginia Equipment Distributors, Inc., and its insurer, Starnet Insurance Company/Berkley Net Underwriters, LLC (collectively “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission. Employer contends the commission erred in (1) concluding the evidence was sufficient to prove Johnny M. Bright, Sr. (claimant) proved his neck/cervical spine, thoracic spine, right shoulder, and brachial plexus injuries were causally related to his work injury as a direct result of the accident, or as a compensable aggravation of a pre-existing condition; (2) according weight to and in relying on the opinions of Drs. Merrick, Nikpey, Crowl, and Herring; (3) failing to accord Dr. Heilbronner's medical opinion the greatest weight; (4) concluding claimant's disability from June 2, 2009 through the present was related to his work injury; and (5) finding the original agreement form did not list any injury to specific body parts. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bright v. Virginia Equip. Distrib., Inc., VWC File No. 235–99–18 (Nov. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1–403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. FN*. Pursuant to Code § 17.1–413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Record No. 2676–10–2
Decided: May 10, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)