Skip to main content

DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. STEPHENSON, 539 U.S. 111 (2003)

United States Supreme Court

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., PETITIONERS v. DANIEL RAYMOND STEPHENSON et al.(2003)

No. 02-271

Decided: June 09, 2003


     Per Curiam.

     With respect to respondents Joe Isaacson and Phyllis Lisa Isaacson, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U. S. 28 (2002).

     With respect to respondents Daniel Raymond Stephenson, Susan Stephenson, Daniel Anthony Stephenson, and Emily Elizabeth Stephenson, the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

     Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. STEPHENSON, 539 U.S. 111 (2003)

Citation: 539 U.S. 111

Docket No: No. 02-271

Decided: June 09, 2003

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard