Skip to main content

PRESSLER v. BLUMENTHAL, 434 U.S. 1028 (1978)

United States Supreme Court


No. 77-450

Decided: January 16, 1978

The motion of James M. Jeffords et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice REHNQUIST, concurring.

In joining the summary affirmance of the judgment of the District Court in this case, I think it important to point out that such affirmance does not necessarily reflect this Court's agreement with the conclusion reached by the District Court on the merits of the Ascertainment Clause ques- [434 U.S. 1028 , 1029]   tion. The District Court decided that appellant did have standing to litigate this issue by virtue of the fact that he was a Member of Congress, but decided the issue against him on the merits. Our "unexplicated affirmance" without opinion could rest as readily on our conclusion that appellant lacked standing to litigate the merits of the question as it could on agreement with the District Court's resolution of the merits of the question.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
PRESSLER v. BLUMENTHAL, 434 U.S. 1028 (1978)

Citation: 434 U.S. 1028

Docket No: No. 77-450

Decided: January 16, 1978

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard