Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
104 Ariz. 193, 450 P.2d 383, appeal dismissed.
Stewart L. Udall for appellant.
Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, appellee, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT v. SOLMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT No. 215.
Decided October 13, 1969
300 F. Supp. 409, affirmed.
Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Francis X. Dineen for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. See King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 . [396 U.S. 5, 6]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 396 U.S. 5
Docket No: No. 204
Decided: October 13, 1969
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)