KING v. GREENBLATT 396 U.S. 26 (1969)

United States Supreme Court

KING v. GREENBLATT (1969)

No. 615

Decided: November 10, 1969

Affirmed.

Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/396/26#">396 U.S. 26 </flCite> (1969) 396 U.S. 26 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)

396 U.S. 26

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 686, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969

41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N. W. 2d 512, appeal dismissed.

Anthony G. Amsterdam, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Sverre O. Tinglum, and William F. Eich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [396 U.S. 26, 27]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network