BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD. 396 U.S. 114 (1969)

United States Supreme Court

BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD. (1969)

No. 593

Decided: December 08, 1969

301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.

Marshall Patner for appellants.

Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MATHIS v. NELSON, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/396/114#">396 U.S. 114 </flCite> (1969) 396 U.S. 114 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MATHIS v. NELSON, 396 U.S. 114 (1969)

396 U.S. 114

MATHIS v. NELSON, WARDEN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 620, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969

70 Cal. 2d 467, 450 P.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [396 U.S. 114, 115]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network