PRONER v. UNITED STATES 395 U.S. 823 (1969)

United States Supreme Court

PRONER v. UNITED STATES (1969)

No. 1022

Decided: June 23, 1969

Certiorari granted; 405 F.2d 943, vacated and remanded.

Harris B. Steinberg for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Benton v. Maryland, ante, p. 784.

ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/395/823#">395 U.S. 823 </flCite> (1969) 395 U.S. 823 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, 395 U.S. 823 (1969)

395 U.S. 823

ANDERSON ET AL. v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. No. 1414.
Decided June 23, 1969.

436 S. W. 2d 533, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Michael Avedisian for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [395 U.S. 823, 824]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law