IN RE GROSS 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

United States Supreme Court

IN RE GROSS (1969)

No. 1035

Decided: March 24, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey, and Michael T. Sauer for the State of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/394/321#">394 U.S. 321 </flCite> (1969) 394 U.S. 321 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

394 U.S. 321

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACHINERY CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1069.
Decided March 24, 1969.

41 Ill. 2d 64, 241 N. E. 2d 857, appeal dismissed.

Harry H. Ruskin for appellant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [394 U.S. 321, 322]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law