DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE 394 U.S. 212 (1969)

United States Supreme Court

DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE (1969)

No. 377

Decided: March 10, 1969

282 Ala. 386, 211 So.2d 803, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

J. Edward Thornton and Glen B. Hardymon for appellant.

Barry Hess for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

POWERS v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/394/212#">394 U.S. 212 </flCite> (1969) 394 U.S. 212 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

POWERS v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT, 394 U.S. 212 (1969)

394 U.S. 212

POWERS ET AL. v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 559, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 . [394 U.S. 212, 213]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network