HANOVER INSURANCE CO. v. VICTOR 393 U.S. 7 (1968)

United States Supreme Court

HANOVER INSURANCE CO. v. VICTOR (1968)

No. 50

Decided: October 14, 1968

Appeal dismissed.

Florindo M. DeRosa, Duncan C. Lee, Frank A. Celentano, and Peter J. Malloy, Jr., for appellant.

Harriet E. Gair for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

COHON v. KIRBY, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/393/7#">393 U.S. 7 </flCite> (1968) 393 U.S. 7 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COHON v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 7 (1968)

393 U.S. 7

COHON ET AL. v.
KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 57.
Decided October 14, 1968.

256 Cal. App. 2d 158, 64 Cal. Rptr. 26, appeal dismissed.

Herbert A. Leland, March E. Leland, J. Bruce Fratis, Joseph L. Alioto, and Richard Saveri for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer and L. Stephen Porter, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [393 U.S. 7, 8]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law