SUTTON v. ADAMS 393 U.S. 404 (1969)

United States Supreme Court

SUTTON v. ADAMS (1969)

No. 726

Decided: January 20, 1969

212 So.2d 1, appeal dismissed.

Milton E. Grusmark for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, pro se, and Robert A. Chastain and Wilson W. Wright, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/393/404#">393 U.S. 404 </flCite> (1969) 393 U.S. 404 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, 393 U.S. 404 (1969)

393 U.S. 404

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 852.
Decided January 20, 1969.

292 F. Supp. 851, affirmed.

Jerome M. Kay for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [393 U.S. 404, 405]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law