SHAW v. GARRISON 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

United States Supreme Court

SHAW v. GARRISON (1968)

No. 579

Decided: December 09, 1968

Affirmed.

Herve Racivitch for appellant.

Eberhard P. Deutsch and Rene H. Himel, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

LANDRY v. BOYLE, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/393/220#">393 U.S. 220 </flCite> (1968) 393 U.S. 220 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LANDRY v. BOYLE, 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

393 U.S. 220

LANDRY ET AL. v. BOYLE, CHIEF JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 659.
Decided December 9, 1968.

280 F. Supp. 938, appeal dismissed.

Robert L. Tucker, R. Eugene Pincham, Jean F. Williams, Leonard Karlin, William M. Kunstler, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 13 (1). [393 U.S. 220, 221]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law