CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV. 392 U.S. 642 (1968)

United States Supreme Court

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV. (1968)

No. 637

Decided: June 17, 1968

381 F.2d 542, affirmed.

Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Julia P. Cooper for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/392/642#">392 U.S. 642 </flCite> (1968) 392 U.S. 642 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 642 (1968)

392 U.S. 642

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1401.
Decided June 17, 1968.

282 F. Supp. 46, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall and Harvey Gelb for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., and Carl Helmetag, Jr., for Penn Central Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [392 U.S. 642, 643]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law