SEFERI v. IVES 391 U.S. 359 (1968)

United States Supreme Court

SEFERI v. IVES (1968)

No. 1241

Decided: May 20, 1968

155 Conn. 580, 236 A. 2d 83, appeal dismissed.

Albert L. Coles for appellants.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Jack Rubin and Clement J. Kichuk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/391/359#">391 U.S. 359 </flCite> (1968) 391 U.S. 359 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 391 U.S. 359 (1968)

391 U.S. 359

NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 1295.
Decided May 20, 1968.

277 F. Supp. 741, affirmed.

Martin A. Weissert for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane, and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Alan F. Wohlstetter for Smyth Overseas Van Lines, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [391 U.S. 359, 360]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law