SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 744 (1968)

United States Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. UNITED STATES(1968)

No. 1159

Decided: April 29, 1968

277 F. Supp. 671, affirmed.

Alan C. Furth, Robert L. Pierce, William P. Higgins and G. Clark Cummings for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; Ernest Porter, Dennis McCarthy, E. L. Van Dellen, Walter G. Treanor and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

HOSACK v. SMILEY, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/390/744#">390 U.S. 744 </flCite> (1968) 390 U.S. 744 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HOSACK v. SMILEY, 390 U.S. 744 (1968)

390 U.S. 744
HOSACK ET AL. v. SMILEY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 1196.
Decided April 29, 1968.

276 F. Supp. 876, affirmed.

Melvin L. Wulf for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and John P. Holloway, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [390 U.S. 744, 745]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law