Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
___ Ore. ___, 432 P.2d 684, appeal dismissed.
Robert W. Gilley for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
LAHMAN, ADMINISTRATRIX v. W. E. GOULD & CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT.
No. 1103.
Decided March 25, 1968.
82 Ill. App. 2d 220, 226 N. E. 2d 443, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Raymond Harkrider for appellant.
Calvin P. Sawyier for appellees W. E. Gould & Co. et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [390 U.S. 458, 459]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 390 U.S. 458
Docket No: No. 1101
Decided: March 25, 1968
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)