JAMES v. GILMORE 389 U.S. 572 (1968)

United States Supreme Court

JAMES v. GILMORE (1968)

No. 850

Decided: January 15, 1968

274 F. Supp. 75, affirmed.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, and J. C. Davis, W. O. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellants.

David R. Richards for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SCHOOL COMM., CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/389/572#">389 U.S. 572 </flCite> (1968) 389 U.S. 572 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHOOL COMM., CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 389 U.S. 572 (1968)

389 U.S. 572

SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 759.
Decided January 15, 1968.

352 Mass. 693, 227 N. E. 2d 729, appeal dismissed.

John W. White for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [389 U.S. 572, 573]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network