RHOADES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP 389 U.S. 11 (1967)

United States Supreme Court

RHOADES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP (1967)

No. 225

Decided: October 09, 1967

424 Pa. 202, 226 A. 2d 53, appeal dismissed.

Franklin C. Salisbury for appellants.

William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John P. McCord, Deputy Attorney General, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and William B. Ball for Paul et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

HOHENSEE v. MINEAR, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/389/11#">389 U.S. 11 </flCite> (1967) 389 U.S. 11 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HOHENSEE v. MINEAR, 389 U.S. 11 (1967)

389 U.S. 11

HOHENSEE ET AL. v. MINEAR.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 190, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Jo V. Morgan, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [389 U.S. 11, 12]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network