RHOADES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, 389 U.S. 11 (1967)

United States Supreme Court

RHOADES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP(1967)

No. 225

Decided: October 09, 1967

424 Pa. 202, 226 A. 2d 53, appeal dismissed.

Franklin C. Salisbury for appellants.

William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John P. McCord, Deputy Attorney General, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and William B. Ball for Paul et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

HOHENSEE v. MINEAR, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/389/11#">389 U.S. 11 </flCite> (1967) 389 U.S. 11 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HOHENSEE v. MINEAR, 389 U.S. 11 (1967)

389 U.S. 11
HOHENSEE ET AL. v. MINEAR.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 190, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Jo V. Morgan, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [389 U.S. 11, 12]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law